Search for: "U.S. v. Diaz*"
Results 401 - 420
of 634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
”) (citing Wilson, 519 U.S. at 410); United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
To serve in the U.S. military? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:55 pm
See Art. 62(a)(3), (b), 10 U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:37 am
Baribeau v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:37 am
Massachusetts, where the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980). [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
It was the case of Briscoe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:15 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. __, 129 S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
Washington (541 U.S. 36 [2004]), overruled its prior holding in Ohio v Roberts ( 41 U.S. 36 [2004]) that reliability of hearsay evidence is the test for admissibility, and held that “Where testimonial evidence is at issue, however, the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination…. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:10 pm
Virginia, __ U.S. _ (Jan. 25, 2010). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. _____. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:52 am
The one paragraph Per Curiam opinion remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Virginia ”for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
His appeal in Noriega v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
In Merrell v. [read post]
Supervisor's Expert Testimony Did Not Violate Confrontation Clause By Describing Peer Review Process
19 Jan 2010, 12:38 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. __, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), in United States v. [read post]
