Search for: "U.S. v. Jefferson*"
Results 401 - 420
of 934
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm
(If you won't believe me, then read Richard Posner's great opinion in Walker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
For this reason, I believe the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
The U.S. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am
Laura Donohue commented on the public v. private collection debate and observed that in the end, it all comes down to power. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 8:23 am
Editor’s Note: This posting is republished with permission from the RLUIPA Defense Blog The U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
And the 2012 Alvarez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
, 76 F.3d 702 (U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
In a U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 1687 (2006) 6 176 Beebe, Barton Empirical Study of U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
Aetna U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]