Search for: "U.S. v. London" Results 401 - 420 of 1,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
” Be that as it may, Lerner adds that “Negotiations for loans to U.S. museums is another matter. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:12 pm by Walter Olson
Patent System is Broken, Declares Judge in Android v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 3:30 am by Nicole Stelle Garnett
New London (U.S. 2004) state eminent domain reforms that mandate above-market compensation for certain categories of takings. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), a bare majority of the US Supreme Court held that takings supported by claims of "economic development" were governed by rational basis review and are not, in every case, devoid of public purpose. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Since 1980, U.S. air carriers have had 234 turbulence-type accidents; resulting in 298 serious injuries and 3 fatalities. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 5:48 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The case is Jade Berreau v McDonald’s Corporation, 2:16-cv-07394 (Central District of California). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:23 pm
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)), or the invalidation of the government action (see, e.g., Lingle v. [read post]