Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS." Results 401 - 420 of 7,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Dale Carpenter
Rather, the Texas court remanded the case so that a lower court could consider, in essence, whether Texas will honor the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:37 am by SHG
When Andrew Fleischman finished writing his Fault Lines post about the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Texas, it added, “will continue to discriminate” unless it is put under an order to get clearance either from the district court in Corpus Christi or from the U.S. attorney general for any changes in voting laws or methods. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:51 am by David W. Miller
To receive Medicaid in Texas, you also must be a resident of Texas and have status with the U.S. government. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Rick Hasen
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) on conspiracy and money laundering charges was unconstitutional, his attorneys contend in a brief filed with a state appeals court Aug. 11 (DeLay v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Medellin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:45 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
” After meticulously going through the various plans for the new voting districts, the federal court concluded in State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
Treating Texas’s photo ID requirement for voters as “the most stringent in the country,” a three-judge U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:10 pm by John Floyd
”   Court Deals Blow to Transparency   Last month the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) in Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:20 pm
Today thirty-one states, led by Texas, filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the respondent in the historic Second Amendment case of D.C. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]