Search for: "US v. Crawford" Results 401 - 420 of 1,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  A: Edison’s Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, aka Fred Ott’s Sneeze, in 1894  ____ Q: Name the Joan Crawford movie at issue in the 1940 Supreme Court case Sheldon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Arizona 13-735Issue: Whether an autopsy report created as part of a homicide investigation, and asserting that the death was indeed caused by homicide, is “testimonial” under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While it is true that such records may later be used in litigation, such was not the sole purpose when they were made, and, therefore, they should not be excluded merely because this was a possible future use. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant’s basis for the objections was his inability to exercise his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him as outlined by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:20 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Volume 358: 1) Transaction Planning Using Rules on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments by Ronald A. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Both are used to establish that the breath test machine used in a particular case is accurate, a necessary foundational requirement for the admission of breath test results as ruled in People v Merts. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am by Glenn
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
However, the records inspection and maintenance and the calibration of the instrument were not testimonial hearsay as such his confrontation rights were not violated under the principle established Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 (2004). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” (The footnote provides the name and citation of the opinion: Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen responds to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal that criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder and cites the Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]