Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 401 - 420
of 51,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm
Alternatively, given that the Deferral Rule expires or will be superseded in a matter of months -- and by then EPA will have at least crystallized the issue before us -- we should hold the case in abeyance as unripe. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 8:12 pm
The Constitutional Court in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince (and others) has given Parliament 24 months to amend current laws criminalising cannabis use. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm
In Wherry v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
Dukes below and has given her comments. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:11 am
As of August 27, 2014, the VA now uses the DSM-V for all mental health claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:35 am
Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:03 am
The Court of Appeal heard arguments regarding whether, if they had accepted Kymab's construction of "in situ replacement", they could nevertheless have found infringement on the basis of Actavis v Eli Lilly (Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48, IPKat post). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:21 pm
In Licea v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:11 am
I was going to start using this analogy, but perhaps it is more distracting than useful, given its very different factual and legal context. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 pm
The case, Hall v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:22 am
The court's refusal to hear the cases preserves the decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, including the case of Latif v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously on Tuesday in US v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:23 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Berghuis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 6-3 [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in Howes v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 2:56 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] in a per curiam opinion Tuesday in Hedgpeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
” Redmond v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
The case, Oracle v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:27 am
Such was the case in Smith v. [read post]
