Search for: "US v. Michael Branch" Results 401 - 420 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm by admin
  You can contact me directly (michael@carabashlaw.com). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Cornell Law Professor Michael Dorf, a former US Supreme Court law clerk, and a serious scholar of the Court, discovered that executive experience is predictive of performance on the Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
Congress could bugger up the criminal investigation by granting General Michael Flynn (or other witnesses) immunity in exchange for their testimony. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am by Will Baude
Echoing the Rehnquist-Scalia-Thomas concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
The most celebrated argument for why Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by Staley Smith
Circuit ruling last week, Zoe Bedell presented us an overview of the DC Circuit’s Opinion in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
Authored by the Director of the DOJ’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, Michael Granston, the Memo was generally interpreted as a signal of DOJ’s greater willingness to consider dismissing certain qui tam matters pursuant to its statutory authority. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
” But to get any useful intel this way, Abbott says, you need the whole data set. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
A very interesting decision handed down Wednesday by a New York appellate court (Weisberger v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Tara Hofbauer
Michael Hayden, the OPM attack “is not ‘shame on China. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm by Ritika Singh
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]