Search for: "US v. Steven Johnson" Results 401 - 420 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
In addition, although Thurgood Marshall served briefly on the 2nd Circuit, his most significant legal experience was as a litigator for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and as Solicitor General in the Johnson Administration. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  More of what we used to produce ourselves will be imported. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
During the term when I clerked for Stevens, Rutan v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Matt Sundquist
Johnson (6:51), Stevens pointedly responded to an advocate who claimed that the government cannot regulate how flags are displayed, saying “I feel quite differently. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Erin Miller
” Justice Stevens’ dissent in Texas v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am by Erin Miller
   He has been a strong proponent of using Ashwander principles of constitutional avoidance to defer deciding constitutional questions, as in INS v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:37 am by Erin Miller
Concurring Opinions also posts on a new essay from the Virginia Law Review about Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
  Sahar Aziz of ACSBlog expressed hope that the Court would use Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Permissible transfers to the spouse The first and most commonly-used safe harbor is a transfer of the home to the person’s spouse. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am by Anna Christensen
Looking back at the Court’s March 2 ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
The Court also heard argument last week in Samantar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm by David Bernstein
And I’ve never gotten over just how ridiculous his reasoning was in his dissent in Texas v. [read post]