Search for: "US v. Watkins" Results 401 - 420 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Paloma used Christison's letter to persuade a transfer agent to issue millions of shares. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
Lawrence on Friday issued an interesting 8-page Entry Regarding Post-Trial Motions regarding costs in the case of Mark Custer v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The Opinion did not otherwise deal with the well-reasoneddecision by Judge Watkins in the District Court and, putting aside the statute of limitation issue,left intact his findings that Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:55 pm
  His application (Callahan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for New York: UCP of Greater Suffolk 250 Marcus Boulevard Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 232-0011 Fax: (631) 232-4422 E-mail: info@ucp-suffolk.org Web: http://www.ucp-suffolk.org 159 Indian Head Road Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-4500 Fax: (631) 543-5162 51-33 Terryville Road Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Phone: (631) 474-5100 Fax: (631) 474-5100 9 Smiths Lane Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-2338 Fax: (631) 543-5162 48 Jagger Lane… [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 1:41 am
GroksterLatham & Watkins "In the latest chapter of the long-running MGM v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:17 pm
The petition, which was filed by Maureen Mahoney of Latham & Watkins, presents the question whether "a patentee's federal patent rights are exhausted by a licensee's authorized sale of an essential component that has no reasonable use other than in practicing the patented invention, when the patentee has purported to retain in its licensing agreement the right to pursue patent infringement claims against those who purchase the component from the licensee and… [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:55 pm
That is the array of issues confronting the Justices as they hear Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]