Search for: "United Licensing Group, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Google Knew Throughout That it Needed a License to Use the Copyrighted Materials2.1 Rubin agreement (as CEO of Danger, his previous company) with Sun of October 19, 20 [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:10 am by Simon Lester
"New Jersey, which has set the gold standard for its gambling laws, should not now have its gambling laws driven by a group like iMEGA that is made up of offshore Internet gambling sites that are not permitted to accept wagers in the United States and are thumbing their nose at the United States Department of Justice," he wrote. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 5:24 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Another organization alleged to have been set up to carry on this fraud was, San Joaquin Accident & Medical Group Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm by S2KM Limited
In the Florida case, against EPS Settlement Group (EPS) and various brokers, a federal judge granted defendants' Motion to Dismiss the plaintiffs' claims with prejudice on December 17, 2014. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
The court pointed to the plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants—EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc., and Warner Music Group Corp. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Zucker Britz Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 stella kordes exit kingdom realty real estate 3 ELLIOTT VILKAS rizzogroup Architecture 1 Ilan Bracha Bracha Group Brokerage - Residential 3 Nadia Nastaskin NTN Realty Group, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Graphic Management Associates, Inc (Docket Report) Merely being a ‘sophisticated company’ does not impute an ‘intent to deceive’ for false marking claim: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am by Marie Louise
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]