Search for: "United States' Response Brief Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction"
Results 401 - 420
of 630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
Furthermore, this is a matter for federal law. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Brief: A document presented to the court outlining one side's position. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
WETLANDS United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
But it beggars plausibility to suggest that two deeply experienced Washington white-collar litigators, representing an embattled President of the United States on issues of the highest imaginable profile, both made the same dumbass blunder regarding intensely sensitive tactical and strategic information in a popular DC restaurant located adjacent to the offices of the New York Times. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
The rule has gained extraordinarily wide acceptance - we previously listed precedent for the rule in 47 states and two other American jurisdictions. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
Principal Attorney (Water Right Unit), Office of the Attorney General. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:56 pm
Just amazed.All military officers, including judge advocates, take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to bear true faith and allegiance to the same.Enlisted personnel take that oath as well, and at least in the Navy, also swear to obey the orders of the officers appointed over them ( to quote: "that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Department of Water Resources, regarding whether the Federal Power Act preempts CEQA as it may apply to state hydropower licensing actions, so there are now two CEQA cases pending at the state’s highest court. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
No district court patent decision in years has stirred as much controversy or generated as much comment as the summary judgment decision of Judge Robert Sweet, in the case titled Association For Molecular Pathology, et al. against United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:53 am
This assumption is also widely held in Germany (with regards to Austria). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:48 pm
Her case became a cause celebre, as she had been subjected to extensive domestic violence. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:11 pm
Recitals are a brief background of agreed facts regarding the marriage and the divorce:(when the couple married, how many kids the couple have, that the couple has agreed to this settlement. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
SHARLENE DOROTHY SUE LING TOM SMITH, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Jurisdiction -- Residency requirement -- Error to deny husband's motion to dismiss wife's dissolution petition, in which he alleged that circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction because husband did not meet residency requirement, without making any findings regarding where husband resided before wife petitioned for divorce in Florida -- Wife, as… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm
Mark Milley, and Commander of the United States Central Command Gen. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
” The court was unimpressed by the state’s condescending response: The State argues that Act 689’s definitions are clear and that “any person of ordinary intelligence can tell that [Act 689] regulates Meta, Twitter[,] and TikTok. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
There is a fuller discussion in the report that Adam Keith and I produced for the United States Holocaust Museum. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
” That is, President Trump is precluded only from receiving benefits in exchange for services provided to a foreign state in his official capacity as president, or—and this is crucial, given the subject matter of the OLC opinions—services provided “in a capacity akin to an employee of a foreign state. [read post]
