Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers" Results 401 - 420 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In the United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
After being retained by Pierce County, Washington, to develop a waste disposal facility in the early ‘80s, Resource Investments, Inc. acquired a parcel of “uniquely desirable” land – desirable, that is, for locating a trash dump – and went about securing necessary permits, including a Clean Water Act permit, which the Army Corps of Engineers denied. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Robert Glicksman analyzes last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 8:39 pm by Consuella Pachico
Supreme Court ruled in, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:39 am by Keith Garner
Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) has proposed new and revised Nationwide Permits (“NWPs”) for certain activities that require authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:39 am by Keith Garner and James Rusk
Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) has proposed new and revised Nationwide Permits (“NWPs”) for certain activities that require authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:02 am by David Markus
And when the sole opinion of the day was read from the bench, in a rollicking appeal about when an agency action is reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]