Search for: "United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota" Results 401 - 420 of 753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in the Privacy & Information Security Law blog, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, in large part, upheld Target’s assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work-product protections for information associated with a privileged, internal investigation of Target’s 2013 data breach. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
In a decision issued late last Friday, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota rejected an effort by class action Plaintiffs to access materials created in the course of Target’s investigation of its 2013 payment card breach that Target claimed were protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
In a decision issued late last Friday, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota rejected an effort by class action Plaintiffs to access materials created in the course of Target’s investigation of its 2013 payment card breach that Target claimed were protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
I was there in 2005 next to pioneering District Attorney Lynne Abraham as we introduced this massive, detailed document of decades of abuse and cover up by Cardinals Krol and Bevilacqua and others. [read post]
In December 2014, most of the lawsuits (even many of those filed in state courts) were consolidated into multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:24 pm by Bill Marler
Both defendants pleaded guilty to violations of conspiracy to defraud the United States, making a false statement, and making a false claim. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:02 am by Drew Falkenstein
Both defendants pleaded guilty to violations of conspiracy to defraud the United States, making a false statement, and making a false claim. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:08 am by Bill Marler
No deaths were reported. 2014 A total of 275 cases were reported from 29 states and the District of Columbia linked to Maryland cucumbers. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 3:27 pm by Bill Marler
District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:55 pm by Bill Marler
One death has been reported from California. 2014 A total of 275 cases were reported from 29 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:16 am
At issue in this Indiana patent lawsuit are three patents, to which Donaldson claims ownership: United States Patent No. 6,488,746 ("the '746 patent"), United States Design Patent No. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That same pattern has emerged in state after state, like Pennsylvania, where Philadelphia District Attorneys Lynne Abraham and Seth Williams put together thorough documentation in 2005 and 2011 Grand Jury Reports, and Minnesota, where statute of limitations reform has opened the door to the justice system that in turn has revealed the specifics of the cover-up. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:07 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
He appealed the conviction, however, arguing that Minnesota’s criminal defamation law violated the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:14 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and downtown Chicago, our Hinsdale and Lake Forest non-compete clause attorneys and lawyers take cases from Aurora and Naperville and many other cities throughout Illinois, as well as in Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:19 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]