Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Utah"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s decision served as a dating convention, and in a way it does. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 5:45 pm
In Sims and Beechum, the California cases relied on by both federal district courts were Jones v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Case number: 13-cv-00753 (United States District Court for the District of Utah) Case filed: August 8, 2013 Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 28, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-53 SEC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 8:31 am
Prohibits the state and political subdivisions from requiring an applicant to perform services unrelated to the approval sought, and prohibits such governmental units from requiring a wireless provider permit applicant to provide more information in its permit application than the governmental unit requires of communications service providers for the same type of permit. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:25 pm
Well, under Military & Veterans Code section 450: "The military courts of this state are: (a) general courts-martial; (b) special courts-martial; (c) summary courts-martial; (d) courts of inquiry; and (e) Courts-Martial Appellate Panel. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
United States (11-247), in which the court will decide whether the state's controversial immigration law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
De YoungCase number: 14-cv-00309 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: April 24, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 21, 2016 5/31/2016 8/29/2016 2016-73 SEC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
United States 14-310Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether, having invalidated the only mechanism the IRS had developed for pursuing refunds of long distance telephone excise taxes unlawfully exacted from individuals, corporations, and non-profit entities between February 28, 2003 and July 31, 2006, the District Court was… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am
State of Utah (Jurisdiction)Ak-Chin Community v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
