Search for: "United States of America v. E"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,928
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
It may be safe to assume that when it comes to the active ingredient, “produced” means… well, “produced” – made, created, developed, manufactured – here in the United States of America. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:44 am
Tying together these contributions is an exploration of the deepened inequities that characterize sexual and reproductive healthcare in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
;(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" As to meaning, applicant's mark "suggests a subset of Opposer's TEQUILA emanating from or associated with the United States of America. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
United States New York federal judge LaShann DeArcy Hall has refused to dismiss a libel claim against “Shitty Media Men” creator Moira Donegan. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
E pluribus unum. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Stated differently, E-1 and E-2 entrants presumably do not undermine the U.S. economy and they apparently “facilitate [America’s] immediate and continued economic recovery” (or they would have been included in the ban), but — counter-factually — L-1 visa holders somehow threaten our economic well-being, even though they are often owned and operated by Americans and employ U.S. workers. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Stated differently, E-1 and E-2 entrants presumably do not undermine the U.S. economy and they apparently “facilitate [America’s] immediate and continued economic recovery” (or they would have been included in the ban), but — counter-factually — L-1 visa holders somehow threaten our economic well-being, even though they are often owned and operated by Americans and employ U.S. workers. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
[so that e]ssentially, [SB 396 is] ‘code cleaning. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
For more, see Randy E. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am
The deal’s predictably less good for minorities because the bargaining’s done in a locked unit. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
There’s truth here, but it’s also worth noting that such arguments can prove too much: why not cities or counties or even smaller units rather than states? [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
