Search for: "United States of America v. Looke" Results 401 - 420 of 2,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm by Hyemin Han
    Join Lawfare We are looking for student contributors. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am by Adam Wagner
 For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
We can see that from the Preamble, which reads, We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 11:20 am by Shawn R. Dominy
Salinas was found guilty and appealed his conviction all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit concluded that it has jurisdiction to review challenges to the controversial “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]