Search for: "United States of America v. Suppressed" Results 401 - 420 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit—whose decisions bind Colorado's school districts—has likewise made clear that any forecast of substantial disruption must rest on a "concrete threat" of substantial disruption. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  But by treating "houses of worship" as the units from which to sample, a disproportionately heavy representation of Christians is the inev [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The precise meaning of this normative America is somehow hidden beneath the surface of politics, encoded in a message from the past. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
(Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council (13 June 2013), p. 11)In the United States of America, although federal civil rights legislation has had undeniable positive impact, many African Americans in particular struggle to achieve their rights to full equality. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
S. 515 now includes: First-Inventor-to-File Adoption of a first-inventor-to-file system by the United States will promote the growth of American jobs. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]