Search for: "United States v. Ali" Results 401 - 420 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff's complaint covers religious living units, diet, and religious dress, items and prayer.In Stevens v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit’s opinion yesterday in Abdul Razak Ali v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Curtis Brown, Sara Liss, and Ali Vaqar worked on the brief. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
One aspect of the ACA is the envisioned effect of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (here’s the USPSTF’s website) role in evaluating screening methods. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Stengel, on the right of patients to sue in state court over failure to warn of side-effects of medical devices; 12-1497, Kellogg Brown & Root v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States may hint at a reprise of the al-Kidd pattern. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
  This was the infamous scorched-earth counterinsurgency campaign in which the Iraqi general Ali-Hassan al-Majid, nicknamed  “Chemical Ali,” boasted in tape-recorded conversations to senior Ba’ath party officials, “I will kill them all with chemical weapons! [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
This is the first in a multi-part series exploring the legal significance of violent online rhetoric by individuals including the vile Bill Schmalfeldt. [read post]