Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
On June 22, 2018, in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
On June 22, 2018, in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:38 am
Mann Hosp. should negate tester standing for all kinds of ADA serial lawsuits. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
United States). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
The United States’ successful, long-honored balance between religious freedom and the rule of law was displaced by RFRA, which invites religious adherents to demand a right not only to believe and practice but also to impose their beliefs on others. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:20 pm
Congress Should Immediately Preempt All State Certificate of Need Laws Congress has plenary authority to expressly preempt any state law affecting interstate commerce, and no one can now question that the federal interest here far exceeds the purely parochial interests served by state certificate of need laws. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
(a) Limitation on Remedies- Chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: `Sec. 514. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
The Act does not state that title in an invention is expressly vested in contractors or anyone else or that inventors are deprived of their priority interest in federally funded inventions (picture, below right - the building that stands for all things federal). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957), explained that the privilege must “give way” when disclosure of the informer’s identity is relevant and helpful to the defense or is essential to a fair determination of the cause. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
The women claim this is discrimination on the basis of their sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
One wonders, whether, in the United States, that will produce the further development of hierarchies of rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
Adoption Law in Turkey and the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
