Search for: "United States v. Ball"
Results 401 - 420
of 956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in the case of Payne v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
United States, 143 Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:59 pm
MAPLES V. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:20 am
For eight years the employee worked as a correctional officer at the Leavenworth Detention Center, a prison operated by the employer under a contract with the United States Marshals Service. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 8:30 am
LEXIS 4028 (2018). [2] Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
The crystal balls were out in Washington recently as scholars and practitioners alike continued to speculate about the future of the ATS following the Supreme Court’s order to rehear arguments in Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
In fact I think these lawyers ought to pay State Farm after Hurricane Wilma wrecked their clients' home and then State Farm low-balled them by $80 grand.United Auto v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
But there is a persuasive Ninth Circuit case, Gardner v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
United States, next term’s case stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey that asks whether a public official defrauds the government of its property when she provides a public-policy reason for an official decision that is not her actual reason, “a conflux of fascinating law and facts. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm
Citizens United and Parents Involved were good first overrulings. [read post]
24 May 2009, 7:48 pm
The defendant's privacy interests in the Blazer is as the United States Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:36 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm
– Writing for the Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
