Search for: "United States v. Bases"
Results 401 - 420
of 37,937
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Undoubtedly, history as taught to most in the United States has been from a nationalistic and [E]urocentric perspective. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
We now have a major decision out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that could prove an important precedent in resisting the growing anti-free speech movement in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
In a collective statement, nine civil society organizations, including Access Now and ARTICLE 19, welcome the United States-led UN General Assembly resolution on “safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
United States that the statute applied to any act “designed to defraud by representations as to the past or present, or suggestions and promises as to the future. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
Lottery offences are covered under s. 206, 207, 207.1 and 209 of the Criminal Code, found in Part VII. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Facts: This case (Maney et al v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
As news of asbestos-related diseases spread across the United States, the American public started to become increasingly suspicious of asbestos companies that had, for so long, denied the dangers of asbestos exposure. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
However, these challenges are limited in number and cannot be used to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, or sex, as established by the Batson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Compare Caraballo-Caraballo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:31 am
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in the case Muldrow v. [read post]
