Search for: "United States v. Blake"
Results 401 - 420
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 5:57 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKLegal ProfessionGovernment's Disqualification Motion Denied; Factors Favored Waiver of Potential Conflicts United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
May 16, 2007)at the 9th Circuit WebsiteThe opinion is also available online at Stanford Cyberlawand at LawGeek (Jason Schulz)The copyright infringement case discussed in this posting and just decided in the 9th Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals really has it all. [read post]
23 May 2007, 7:13 am
United States, 519 U.S. 148, 157 (1997).... [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:36 am
Washington and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:48 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
Maybe in some world where everyone agreed about what the post-Booker structure of sentencing would be, but not here.In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:59 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:07 am
A key case underlying the opinion is United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:41 pm
The panel notes that it can't address United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
