Search for: "United States v. Citizen Publishing Company" Results 401 - 420 of 725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies  illegally process their personal information. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
The last of these has been a mystery to many scholars and practitioners – indeed, even in the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm by Thomas James
I then cited the provision of the United States Code that imposes an obligation to register for Selective Service only upon male citizens. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Here is a free legal opinion thanks to the Student Press Law Center: New York Times Company v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Unites States According to court filings in the defamation lawsuit, Elon Musk overruled advice from his inner circle at Tesla and SpaceX that he offer a “genuine” apology and take a Twitter break after using the social media platform to attack a critic last year. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright Mischon de Reya published a blog post analysing the difference between guidance published by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) in relation to the trademarking of NFTs, virtual goods and services in the metaverse. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
” Parole in place allows noncitizens who enter the United States without authorization to remain for a specific period of time. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The dispute related to eight articles published online in Swedish by the Defendants that were alleged to be defamatory of C1, a Swedish citizen and director of C2, an English apex holding company. [read post]