Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co." Results 401 - 420 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States, a challenge to the federal sex offender law. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit)   United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial… [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Furthermore, on a proper construction of sections 9 and 10 of the Crimes Ordinance, the prosecution is required to prove that the defendant cannot benefit from the “defence” stated in section 9(2) of the Crimes Ordinance, and that the defendant had a seditious intention when he did the act complained of. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
A bit of background is in order before looking at how Congress addresses this question in the NDAA: Hamdi v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by Kyle Wallor
”   In 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Dutra Construction Co. (2005), the United States Supreme Court held that a vessel need only be “practically capable” of maritime transport. [read post]