Search for: "United States v. Council" Results 401 - 420 of 4,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The [Miss United States of America] Pageant would not be able to communicate "the celebration of biological women" if it were forced to allow Green to participate. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
 The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:21 am by Ben Sperry
Circuit Court of Appeals put it in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Eugenia Lostri, Stephanie Pell
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” It conditionally criminalized aiding or abetting most abortions if the United States Supreme Court later overruled Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
The section of the Report Process and Engagement notes “…In October, the Dean of Arches provided a very comprehensive overview on the Consistory Court system and William Nye, Secretary General to the Archbishops’ Council, gave an update on resourcing for the Racial Justice Unit, and an overview of progress on From Lament to Action”. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The ACDP reminded Parliament that “in the United States of America, fair use has been developed over a period of a 150 years of jurisprudence, while South Africa does not have this case law history or experience”. [read post]