Search for: "United States v. Diamond" Results 401 - 420 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by lawmrh
Constitution, “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Preliminary Round #2 Q1: In the famous patentable subject matter case of Diamond v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Nearly Legal on No admittance : Sharon Horie v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
The cooperation of the former director of the UBS private banking division promises to lead the IRS to clients such as the one for whom Birkenfeld admitted smuggling diamonds in a toothpaste tube. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by Rohit De
Pirate treasures, Nazi diamonds, Russian spies, gun runners and Mau-Mau fighters are thrown into alongside love, hate, lust, greed, fear and revenge in the mix of motives.As I moved on from Nairobi following research leads to London and then Delhi, I found my research sites mirrored in the work of M.M Kaye. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by Justine Moller
Small-scale mining relates to mining over an area covering a minimum of three cadastre units and not exceeding 120 cadastre units. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Id. at 222, 232 (quoting Diamond v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:46 am
In 2009 the Feds seized several guitars and pallets of wood from a Gibson factory, and both sides have been wrangling over the goods in a case with the delightful name "United States of America v. [read post]
” Perhaps viral video recordings of Black Americans being beaten, tortured, and executed only reinforce white supremacy in the United States? [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
  The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Charneski determined that the relevant portion of the preamble, “said manufacturing equipment being adapted to manufacture said semiconductor device in units of lots,” shows that the semiconductor device is manufactured in “units of lots,” and concluded that allowing for per-lot sampling would be contrary to the plain meaning of the preamble because the semiconductor devices would not be manufactured in “units of lots. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]