Search for: "United States v. Douglas" Results 401 - 420 of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
  Section 798(a)(3) states that[w]hoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information ... concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by Nicandro Iannacci
It was on this day in 1965 that the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case about contraception use by married couples that laid the groundwork for a constitutional “right to privacy” in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Leonardo Mangat and Douglas Wagner preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
It's always fun to watch an appellate court wriggle out of its dilemma when two rote rules clash, and the Second Circuit's decision in United State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In 1989, the Texas Supreme Court, in the case, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]