Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 pm
We can take it to declare, as Scalia did, that the United States should never deny any prisoner the rights he would have had if he had lived in England or America in 1789, except in rebellions or invasions. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
United States, 197 U.S. 207; Bailey v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
The Works of JohnAdams, Second President, of the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
T he ECHR has also recognised that art 8 protects against nuisances, such as noise pollution and toxic fumes (López Ostra v Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277 (ECHR) at [44]–[58]; Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 (ECHR); Moreno Gómez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 (ECHR); and Arrondelle v United Kingdom (1982) 26 DR 5.) [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:08 am
In The Hilb Group of New England, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
See Grausz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:24 am
A recent petition for certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court asks the Court to clarify what an aggrieved investor must plead to state a claim for securities fraud under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am
Thus, when he returned from England, he was a free man because British friends had purchased his liberty. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am
Thus, when he returned from England, he was a free man because British friends had purchased his liberty. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
United States, No. 1:17-cv-2487 (KBJ) (D.D.C. 2019) (memorandum opinion) Guam v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:04 am
United States, 156 U.S. 51, 102 (1895). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
