Search for: "United States v. Free" Results 401 - 420 of 17,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
 While on the topic of free expression and the censorship thereof, here  are the different approaches of  the United States and Canada to censoring so-called obscenity. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 9:06 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, August 19, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mays v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by Mike Worgul
North Dakota (2016), the United States Supreme Court held that state authorities may subject you to criminal penalties for refusing to take a breathalyzer test if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:06 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  At this point, the claimant can appeal to the United States District Court and, if that doesn’t work, the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 57220, April 3, 2013) and permitted an inmate to proceed with his free exercise claim that authorities seized two religious books from his cell.In Goodwill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am by Adam Wagner
British Airways Plc v Unite the Union Queen’s Bench Division, 17 May 2010 – Read judgment Update (07/06/20) – this decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal on 20/05/10. [read post]