Search for: "United States v. Gear" Results 401 - 420 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Indeed, he argues, the government presented no evidence of Hatim’s conduct that post-dated October of 2001, when the United States got involved in Afghanistan, or even September 11. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
And what we found was that almost every major law enforcement agency across the United States already has these tools. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Benjamin Wittes
District for the Northern District of California seeking, as it wrote in its brief: a temporary restraining order and, after a hearing has been held, an order prohibiting, enjoining, and restraining defendants National Security Agency, United States of America, Department of Justice, Barack H. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
 Why did Sebastien Boucher waive his Miranda  rights and then even use his password to show police around the child pornography-containing Z-drive of the laptop computer they seized on his entry to the United States from Canada, where he is a citizen? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am by Guest Barista
But two cases where the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari are the Two Pesos case and the Qualitex case. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
Executions in the United States had been on hold since last September, when the Court decided to take on the case of Baze v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
The updates are geared toward a “simplified” approach for controllers and processors. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:43 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
The decision was appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:08 am
The New School, 14 N.Y.3d 469 (2010), the New York Court of Appeals settled the open question of whether the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense available under federal law applies to sexual harassment and retaliation claims brought under the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”).United States Department of Labor to revise regulations on reporting of costs related to union organizing campaignsBond Schoeneck & KingAs part of its Spring 2010 regulatory agenda,… [read post]