Search for: "United States v. Grant, III" Results 401 - 420 of 2,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (emphasis added); see also Taylor Made Software, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
§1915(a)(3), (b)(iii), as failing to satisfy the rational-basis standard of Morton v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Holly Brezee
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Ahead of tomorrow’s court session, the Prairie Star National Trust, which claims some sovereign status independent of jurisdiction by the United States or its courts, filed more paper on Miller’s behalf with the court. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 7:54 am by Gregory B. Williams
Burke recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings seeking the dismissal of Counts III, IV and V of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint which purport to assert state law claims for conversion, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
The district court granted the states summary judgment, concluding that the actuarial-certification rule is an impermissible delegation of legislative power and exceeded CMS’ statutory authority. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
Supreme Court Clarifies Pre-Suit Demand Analysis Another Supreme Court decision that has already been the subject of extensive analysis but is still required reading for all corporate litigators is United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:09 am by Alvaro Marañon
  This memorandum establishes and clarifies additional authority and responsibilities of the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) in connection with the National Manager responsibilities for NSS assigned to the Director of the NSA by National Security Directive 42 of July 5, 1990 (National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems) (NSD-42), Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended (United States Intelligence… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:09 am by Alvaro Marañon
  This memorandum establishes and clarifies additional authority and responsibilities of the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) in connection with the National Manager responsibilities for NSS assigned to the Director of the NSA by National Security Directive 42 of July 5, 1990 (National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems) (NSD-42), Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended (United States Intelligence… [read post]