Search for: "United States v. Julian"
Results 401 - 420
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 4:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
It’s because he or she thinks they can get away with it.“ The BBC has responded to an article in the Daily Mail which claimed that the BBC spent £4m laying off staff, but half the employees continued working as normal. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court begins a two-day hearing in the high-profile case of Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority today. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
The Court has also issued a guidance note for the press expected to attend the hearing, with priority being given to organisations reporting for the UK, Sweden and Australia, with those reporting for the United States being given the next level of priority. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm
HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
United States. __ M.J. __, Misc. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
At CATO@Liberty, Julian Sanchez responds to Orin Kerr’s preview of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Cato@Liberty: A Response to Orin Kerr on GPS Tracking by Julian Sanchez: Orin Kerr—easily one of our most lucid thinkers when it comes to applying the Fourth Amendment to new technologies—argues at Volokh Conspiracy that, while it’s a hard call whether the installation of a GPS tracking device to a vehicle counts as a Fourth Amendment “search” or “seizure,” the Supreme Court should not treat the use of such devices as a search when it decides… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Second, they could be forfeited under 19 USC 1497(a)(1) because there was no declaration of entry made on any customs form when imported into the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
Only the United States can take actions such as regime change. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am
If the victim does not wish to testify the government will attempt to admit the 911 calls into evidence, pursuant to case law from the United States Supreme Court, that that allows statements made to a 911 operator to come into evidence without the defendant being given the opportunity to cross-examine the victim under a case known as Davis v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:30 am
As the Court stated in The Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:13 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
First, there is the quite stunning concurrence by three judges of the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals, which explicitly adopts the concurring opinion of Justice Sevens in the Medellin v. [read post]
