Search for: "United States v. Legal Services for New York City" Results 401 - 420 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am by Rachel Bercovitz
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Vashon was denied admission not because of any lack in his legal capabilities (he became the first black person admitted to the New York Bar in 1848), but because he was not a white man. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Kristian Soltes
Leads in Mobile Payments But Trails in ContactlessDigital Transactions News – June 11, 2019 A survey of more than 3,000 consumers in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, sponsored by Transaction Network Services, shows the heaviest adoption of mobile-payment apps in the U.S., at 59% of respondents, but the highest adoption of contactless payments in the U.K., at 79%. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
In an interview with The New York Times, Stevens talked about what he called a telling flaw in the opening sentence of the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Question 1: Where is this city, in the United States or in China? [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Rounding out the state-specific discussions is a cogent offering in § 5 entitled, “Workplace Violence in New York Workers’ Compensation Claims,” by Ronald E. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  The plaintiffs alleged that under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Nevada state wage and hour laws, the NFL misclassified the security representatives as independent contractors. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
Department of Social Services of City of New York, the court considered whether a municipality is a “person” subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm by David Urban
  Even some prominent legal scholars are calling for another look at First Amendment doctrine as it applies to internet speech promoting violence, or promoting adherence to adversaries of the United States such as ISIS. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
In The New York Times, Miriam Jordan reports that the court’s ruling has cast doubt on the prospects of refugees seeking resettlement in the United States. [read post]