Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am
Lord Hamblen and Lady Rose dissent. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm
In Sienkiewicz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am
Davies v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
United States A hedge fund billionaire has filed a $50 million defamation suit against his Bahamas neighbour, after being accused of arson, racism, drug trafficking and murder. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
Lord Mance gave the lead judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
On September 13, the court received a letter from Bertha stating that she would be staying in the United States indefinitely with Z.F.M.Z. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
Chang Qiang Zhu is a Chinese citizen who seeks asylum in the United States on the grounds of religious persecution: He claims he was persecuted because he was a Christian. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
On 11 February Lord Justice Warby handed down judgment on the summary judgment application in the case of HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
United States, 365 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Lord & Essex, Inc., the court rejected an “extremely narrow view” of two contr [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
United States, 97 U.S. 237; Hopt v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns… [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
Good lord, what a disgrace he is. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm
Right to liberty: Entick v Carrington (1765) Prohibition on retrospective liability: Philips v Eyre (1870) 6 QB 1 (see our recent post on this principle) Prohibition of torture has long been a “constitutional principle”, according to Lord Bingham in A & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 221 The right to fair trail, defined in the Magna Carter as “due process of the law” (Chapter 29 of the 1354… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
United Kingdom (E. [read post]
