Search for: "United States v. Matthew Day"
Results 401 - 420
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
United States, in which the Court recently heard reargument on whether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
On the same day there will be PTRs before Mann J in the cases of Hannon v NGN and Dufour v NGN. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
United Parcel Service? [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Matthew R. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
This lawsuit against DSS comes two months to the day after our state Supreme Court, in the case of Abbeville County School District v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
And, with all this talk of authorizations to use military force, Cody Poplin shared the text of the documents from the last time the United States declared a state of war following the attacks on Pearl Harbor in this week’s Throwback Thursday. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The husband immigrated to the United States from Ireland in 1984 and began working as a handyman. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm
In Syria, the United States once again launched air strikes against the Khorasan group, a faction of the al Nusra Front, on Wednesday night. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
United States, which asks the question: Was it the government that went overboard? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
By Matthew Skurnik Since the Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am
The NITA Conference was informative and well attended by people and tribes from all over the United States and Indian Country. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
