Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 401 - 420 of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 9:00 am by centerforartlaw
A high-profile Nazi-era restitution claim has been making waves since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision on February 3, 2021.[1] Known commonly as the Guelph Treasure or Welfenschatz case, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, March 7, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 9:31 am by Tryn T. Stimart and Jean E. Dassie
This post is intended as a snapshot of the CRISPR-Cas9 legal landscape in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm by FM Librarian
” Here’s What That Means for Immigrants (Vox, updated 5 March 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (16 Feb. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by Mike Hanzel
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by propertyprof
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania presents some interesting issues about the law of eminent domain. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
The post District Court Affirms United States Copyright Office’s Denial of Copyright Registration for AI-Generated Visual Art appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
The post District Court Affirms United States Copyright Office’s Denial of Copyright Registration for AI-Generated Visual Art appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
The post District Court Affirms United States Copyright Office’s Denial of Copyright Registration for AI-Generated Visual Art appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
Software Eligibility in the United States Nowhere in the United States Patent Act (Title 35 of the United States Code) is software or computer programs specifically mentioned. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Here is the abstract: On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by sally
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Misti D. Munster
United States Department of Health and Human Services, declared Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a dissenter to the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]