Search for: "United States v. Mohamed" Results 401 - 420 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The government contends that the petitioner, a former senior Taliban official, is lawfully detained because he was part of Taliban forces and purposefully and materially supported such forces in hostilities against the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment   1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:25 am by Tom Parker
Last month the Supreme Court also refused to hear arguments relating to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to allow the government to hide behind the ‘state secrets privilege’ in the Mohamed v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
  Writing for the New York Times, Adam Liptak both summarizes the decision and links it to last week’s denial of certiorari in Mohamed v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Among the cases denied review on Monday, perhaps the highest visibility one was Mohamed, et al., v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
Power Coop. et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Mohamed v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:30 am
Circuit opinions has shed further light on the membership element.Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman(left), a Yemeni, was captured at the Afghan-Pakistani border 12 miles from Tora Bora, the mountainous site of a major battle between the United States and combined Al Qaida and Taliban forces in December 2001. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Breyer, seemingly accepting that the case was about release “into the United States,” used that phrase in his opinion and put it in italics, for emphasis. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:33 am by Rick St. Hilaire
US Attorney Richard Callahan responded on March 16 by initiating a lawsuit against the mummy mask.In a complaint titled United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Louis Art Museum (SLAM) on February 15, 2011 filed a lawsuit against the United States seeking a declaratory judgment in the case of the Ka-Nefer-Nefer mummy mask. [read post]