Search for: "United States v. Padilla" Results 401 - 420 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Padilla (PDF), 542 U.S. 426 (2004) Johnson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
VirginiaDocket: 10-1498Issue(s): (1) Whether Padilla v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
OHIM, José María Padilla Requena (1709 Blog) Inbev loses Budweiser CTM appeal: Anheuser-Busch Inc. v OHIM, Bud? [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
The Los Angeles Times continues the discussion over United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Wegner… In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-361, involves a bribery ring in Baltimore under which the owners of a car-repair shop paid police officers to refer to them business resulting from the car collisions to which they responded. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
I never said that, the Supreme Court never said that, and I would never do that as President of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am by SHG
 Yet, his decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
US, which raises the question of whether the Court’s 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]