Search for: "United States v. Poland"
Results 401 - 420
of 479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
(IP finance) Australia Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) Apple picks Woolworths in trade mark dispute (Australian Trade Marks) (Trademark Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Australian man creates ‘Piracy Payback’ website to collect donations from downloaders for distribution to rightholders’ organisations (Ars Technica) Canada Amazon… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
– FIFA IP victories (Afro-IP) Switzerland Heineken versus Keineken: trade mark parody in the Alps (Class 46) Syria Syria recognises unregistered trademarks (The IP Factor) Tanzania S26 baby food scare – possibly counterfeits (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Article in The Times regarding James Joyce’s heir’s agreement to new budget edition of Ulysses – revived copyright (1709 Copyright Blog) UK IPO:… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode) United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Italy Milan Court clarifies validity requirements of registered Community designs (Class 46) Poland Procedural problems – JAZZ JAMBOREE registration (Class 46) Tricky representative – SCOTCH & SODA trade mark dispute (Class 46) South Africa Report on South African Copyright Act – Shuttleworth Foundation (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): When do you sue a holding company? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office) Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP) Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46) South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46) United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
For example, In United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s)… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
