Search for: "United States v. Radice" Results 401 - 420 of 1,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
  This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Lewis
Along with the broader militia ecosystem in the United States, these movements have enjoyed years of relative freedom online and offline to recruit, fundraise, and radicalize their supporters to violence. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
After many unsuccessful attempts to leave the U.S.S.R. and its oppressive regime, Somin and his family managed to vote with their feet for greater liberty in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
But in subsequent decisions, the Court embraced a more nuanced approach: First, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
“The radical socialist Democrats are the ones who hate our beautiful Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
After it was discovered that the death rate from obesity is 80 times higher than from foodborne illnesses per year (400,000 v. 5,000 respectively), it became clear that ultra-processed foods and foods, rich in sugar and saturated fats threaten our lives even more than foodborne parasites, disease-caused bacteria, toxins, unapproved additives or allergens, traditionally associated with food safety, and that FDA’s policy in that area should include initiatives addressing the quality of… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by David Kopel
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]