Search for: "United States v. Read" Results 401 - 420 of 29,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:04 am by Ben Jumonville and Mikha Romero
[1] National Small Business United, d/b/a the National Small Business Association v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:53 am by Larry
United States in which the importer challenged the tariff classification of several versions of the gaseous tritium light sources ("GTLS"). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am by Holly
The law made its way to the courts in a dispute as to whether British limitation law or United States law would apply to the claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
The statute states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am by Matt Kurnick
By the time the devices were imported into the United States, the Myval System had been approved for use in India and Europe, but not in the United States. [read post]