Search for: "United States v. Register"
Results 401 - 420
of 6,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANASOUTH BEND DIVISIONROBERT BROWN, Plaintiff vs. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
The US Supreme Court will not decide whether retroactive application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause in the ungainly-named case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
One of the most closely-watched cases is Kansas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Wall-Street.com, LLC, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that registration occurs when the Copyright Office registers a copyright. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
One of the foundational principles of United States trademark law, as well as the law of most other countries, is that trademark protection is national in nature and does not extend beyond a country in which the mark is used or registered. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 3:51 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:46 am
At issue is the line between advice and the practice of veterinary medicine, the very issue-in-suit in Hines v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
The United States Supreme Court in 2014 ruled in Heien v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
The United States Supreme Court in 2014 ruled in Heien v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm
.), handed down on Friday alters the course of personal jurisdiction law in Pennsylvania relative to corporations.In reviewing the history of the law on this issue, the court noted that, in 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Daimler AG v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:11 am
DuSablon, Defendant/ Appellant (Opinion, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 18-2809 / February 6, 2019)http://brokeandbroker.com/PDF/JCB7Cir.pdf Although state-chartered Jackson County Bank ("JCB") was not a registered broker-dealer, it offered brokerage services to its customers via a third-party agreement with INVEST Financial Corporation. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:54 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to consider arguments in the Pennsylvania case of Mallory v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Likewise, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) held repeatedly that comparable strategies could constitute bad faith [e.g. here, here and here]. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
It noted that in Belmora, Bayer acknowledged that it did not use the mark FLANAX in the United States; here Coca-Cola proved that is products are sold by third-party importers in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:45 pm
§ 101 in view of the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
