Search for: "United States v. Russell"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
United States last Term.) [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am
United States (Federal Taxation) Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:51 pm
The United States can hold parties to asset transfers, both transferors and transferees, personally liable for outstanding debts owed to the United States by a debtor. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
For the United States: Edwin S. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Specifically, in 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 am
Russell, 221 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 2000) (No. 99-4117) Read more [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
United States 14-310Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether, having invalidated the only mechanism the IRS had developed for pursuing refunds of long distance telephone excise taxes unlawfully exacted from individuals, corporations, and non-profit entities between February 28, 2003 and July 31, 2006, the District Court was nevertheless… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:06 pm
On February 20, 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of LaRue v DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., unanimously holding that individual participants in defined contribution plans regulated by ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) can sue their plan administrator for a breach of fiduciary duty that reduces the value of their individual account. [read post]
