Search for: "United States v. Sample"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
If you are bothering to read this blog, you likely know that most goods entering the United States are appraised on the basis of transaction value, whch is the total price paid or payable for the merchandise when sold for export to the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:43 pm
Court of International Trade in the ongoing tussle known as United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:37 am
James Sample, "Caperton: Correct Today; Compelling Tomorrow. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:13 am
– United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi – December 13th, 2018) involves a pollution claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Facts: This consumer class action litigation (Suchanek et al v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 12:59 pm
Any cases currently pending in County Criminal Division “V” will be transferred to Circuit Criminal Division “V. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
Tubbs’ background with included service with the United States Coast Guard as a spill response pollution investigator. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:58 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
Stranch and United States District Judge Michael R. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
The United States Supreme Court has expressly ruled that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination only extends to testimonial or communicative evidence. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:27 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court allowed a $5.8 million verdict for unpaid overtime against Tyson Foods to stand. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:10 am
” Facts: This case (Malgeri et al v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Facts: This case (Marketquest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
