Search for: "United States v. Stamps"
Results 401 - 420
of 900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
The DOJ filed the case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:17 am
In Arden v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
The SJC concluded that the admission of the certificate violated the defendant's rights of confrontation and cross-examination under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States * * *. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm
The Marshals even helped destroy evidence of the crimes for which Jeffs was accused by burglarizing a former FLDS member's business.Later in the discussion of the allegations, however, there are some claims of discriminatory actions against non-FLDS members of the kind we more commonly see.The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
The BBC discloses that the Islamic State alleges that the United States has launched airstrikes targeting the Tabqa dam near Raqqa, the so-called caliphate’s largest stronghold in Syria. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
From State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm
That being said, it’s also required me to read A LOT about the history of money and its regulation in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:10 pm
So it was a bit surprising to see a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland which held that a collection law firm that forged signatures on foreclosure documents, and instructed staff to forge notary stamps certifying the forged signature, did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) because the actions were not "material. [read post]
