Search for: "United States v. State of Mich." Results 401 - 420 of 944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:08 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
At the government's request, the Sixth Circuit has published its previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:33 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
"The opinion itself is notable for its harsh criticism of the decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:39 pm
Chrylser L.L.C., 481 Mich. 266 (2008), and People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
THE ZEN OF PASSING THE BAR EXAM / CHAD NOREUIL Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, c2011 KF303 .N673 2011 See Catalog Bible THE HOLY BIBLE, AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Bible Publishers, c1983 BS185 1983 .M53 1983 See Catalog Biotechnology -- legislation & jurisprudence -- China IMITATION TO INNOVATION IN CHINA / YAHONG LI Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, c2010 KNQ1194 .L55 2010 See Catalog Burden of proof -- United… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
THE ZEN OF PASSING THE BAR EXAM / CHAD NOREUIL Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, c2011 KF303 .N673 2011 See Catalog Bible THE HOLY BIBLE, AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Bible Publishers, c1983 BS185 1983 .M53 1983 See Catalog Biotechnology -- legislation & jurisprudence -- China IMITATION TO INNOVATION IN CHINA / YAHONG LI Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, c2010 KNQ1194 .L55 2010 See Catalog Burden of proof -- United… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has cautioned that this rule does not relieve a pro se litigant of the obligation to follow a court's procedural rules …. [read post]