Search for: "United States v. Torres"
Results 401 - 420
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
Torres v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:16 pm
" See also, U.S. v Torres-Garcia, 2007 U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:45 am
" Torres v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
"Typically, such conduct is not sufficient to secure dismissal of criminal charges in the United States, due to US Supreme Court precedent in the case of United States v Alvarez-Machaim. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Sufficiency arguments fail, as do Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Santoyo-Torres, No. 07-2204 A conviction for possessing methamphetamine with intent to d [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Hines, 374 F.3d 935, 939 (10th Cir.2004); Torres v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 1:14 pm
In today’s decision in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Supreme Court's analysis, please use this link: New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Patricia Millett will argue United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: That is conferring upon the ICJ the responsibility to decide the meaning of a United States treaty which is United States law. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Per UNITED STATES v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:37 am
The song eventually ended up on three CDs, distributed both in Puerto Rico and the continental United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 3:38 pm
The transcript from today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
(SCOTUSwiki) At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
