Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon"
Results 401 - 420
of 790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:29 pm
Like last week’s similar decision by a federal court in Idaho, today’s ruling is part of a growing trend of state and federal court invalidations of laws banning same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:50 pm
Counting both federal and state court decisions, it’s the seventeenth consecutive judicial win for same-sex marriage advocates since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Oregon state law grants his clients property rights, rights that were borne out by facts on the ground. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:59 am
In Souza v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:00 am
United States, (D OR, April 29, 2014), an Oregon federal district court allowed a pro se plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed, with leave to amend, his suit complaining that the Internal Revenue Service had denied Section 501(c)(3) status for a small church he had founded. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
I would recommend to the District Attorney that they explore prosecuting Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
The only state supreme court ever to probe the meaning of the phrase is that of Oregon, which, in Vannatta v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
We also saw more states (e.g., Arkansas, Utah, New Mexico, California, Colorado, Nevada, Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington) enact legislation to protect employees’ “personal” social media accounts and we expect more states to follow. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
Court Upholds New Jersey Law Prohibiting Job Ads Requiring Job Applicants Who Are Currently Employed
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
It also noted that Oregon, the District of Columbia and New York City have passed similar laws over the past several years, and Rhode Island is considering doing the same. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
Cox Loses In The Trial Court, Which Gets It Wrong Padrick sued in United States District Court in Oregon. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
