Search for: "Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendants" Results 401 - 420 of 1,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2010, 8:56 am by emagraken
 231, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) may be the nominal defendant and liable for damages to the plaintiff for damages from a motor vehicle accident where the identities of the owner and driver of the other vehicle involved are not ascertained. [5]             ICBC will only be liable as nominal defendant if the plaintiff has made “all reasonable efforts… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 pm by John A. Gallagher
Moreover, where a defendant has provided consideration for the release of a plaintiff’s FLSA claims arising from a particular event, which is the case here, the Court is without knowledge as to the value of those claims…The release of an unknown claim based on a separate statutory cause of action frustrates the fairness of the benefit otherwise provided under the proposed Settlement Agreement. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm by NRF Digital Team
  The defendant’s expert obstetrician testified that there are sentinel events of unknown cause, which are clinically silent (for example, compression of the umbilical cord). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Oct. 1, 2015) Plaintiff NJ PURE sued Boynton, who added third-party defendants Joanna Elias and Eric Poe. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:58 pm by Charles Bieneman
”  This order would both “cause relatively minimal harm to defendants,” but also would relieve the plaintiff of “a risk of an unknown degree of ongoing and potentially increasing infringement. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am by DMLP Staff
However, if the plaintiff does not present evidence of financial harm, they may not be able to recover damages, even if they can enjoin the defendant from future use of their identity. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am by CMLP Staff
However, if the plaintiff does not present evidence of financial harm, they may not be able to recover damages, even if they can enjoin the defendant from future use of their identity. [read post]