Search for: "Vikram David Amar"
Results 401 - 420
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 5:00 pm
At FindLaw, Vikram David Amar has this column on the Court's ruling in the Lance v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:00 pm
Yen … [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
At FindLaw, Vikram David Amar discusses what he sees as the growing Supreme Court tendency "to grant review in cases raising 'jurisdictional' questions. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:42 am
News and World Report’s decision not to take diversity into account in its rankings formula have come out that are worth checking out if the topic is of interest: Vikram David Amar & Kevin R. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
Vikram David Amar has this column at FindLaw discussing a California ruling on pupil assignments that may serve as an alternative to the Seattle and Louisville race-based pupil assignment plans if the the Supreme Court turns them down. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:26 am
By David H. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In my last column (Part One of this series), I began to lay out what I think might (and should) happen if the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Briefly: At Verdict, Vikram David Amar examines the issues in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
On the eve of the High Court’s momentous decision (and Verdict’s comparatively diminutive birthday), we invite you to review what Justia columnists Vikram David Amar and Michael Dorf have been writing about Obamacare. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Some Key Background of the NPV Concept The essential idea (elaborated by me, my brother Akhil Amar and, independently also by Professor Robert Bennett over a decade ago) is to get various states to sign onto an agreement that would require each signatory state to cast its electoral college votes not for the candidate who garners a plurality of popular votes in that state, but rather for the candidate who wins the most popular votes nationally. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:55 am
And we are grateful to the following guest contributors, who will weigh in on how the Court is likely to (or should) rule in the case and why: Vikram Amar – UC Davis School of Law Joshua Civin – NAACP Legal Defense Fund Roger Clegg – Center for Equal Opportunity David Bernstein – George Mason University School of Law Adam Winkler – UCLA Law School and David Gans – Constitutional Accountability Center Vincent Eng… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
As Vikram David Amar notes here, "If the Ninth Circuit concludes that the Proposition 8 sponsors lack standing, then what? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
See Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:28 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar analyzes the Pew Research Center’s study showing that “the percentage of adult Americans who hold a favorable view of the Supreme Court (52%) is at a 25-year low. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
At FindLaw, Vikram David Amar has this essay on the Supreme Court's decision in Philip Morris and its broader implications. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
Illinois law dean and professor Vikram David Amar considers one majority opinion and two dissents by the late Justice that he finds himself most drawn to for Verdict. [read post]
